A CCS connector can be used with a Type 2 charging station when the station supports dual plug compatibility, allowing for power delivery up to the station’s maximum capacity. Communication via OCPP 2.0.1 remains functional without cloud dependency, as the charging station handles local protocol processing and can operate in offline mode. The key is ensuring the hardware and firmware support both plug types and the required communication standards.
How It Works in Practice
In real-world deployments, a charging station with a Type 2 socket and a CCS adapter allows flexibility for different vehicle types. The station must be configured to recognize and authenticate both plug types. This setup is common in fleet and commercial environments where multiple vehicle types are served. The charging process is managed through the station’s local control unit, which handles communication with the vehicle and the central management system.
For example, a public charging station might support both CCS and Type 2 connectors to serve electric vehicles from various manufacturers. The station’s firmware must be updated to support OCPP 2.0.1, ensuring that it can communicate effectively with the Charge Management System (CMS) even when offline. This dual compatibility reduces the need for multiple station types and simplifies infrastructure deployment.
Implications for OCPP 2.0.1 Communication
OCPP 2.0.1 communication remains robust when using a CCS connector with a Type 2 station, provided the station is equipped with a local edge computing platform. This ensures that charging sessions can be managed and reported even without an active internet connection. The system can store session data locally and synchronize with the CMS once connectivity is restored.
For Charge Point Operators (CPOs), this capability means greater operational flexibility and resilience. It allows for consistent service delivery in areas with unreliable internet or during network outages. The local processing also reduces latency in communication, improving the responsiveness of the charging infrastructure. This is particularly important for dynamic pricing and load balancing features that rely on real-time data exchange.
Related Reading
For more on related topics, see: Type 2 vs CCS1 Connector Technical Differences.
Further reading: CMS-Based Energy Management for EV Charging: OCPP Smart Charging in India | Tecell CMS Blog
📣 Join our Telegram channel for EV charging technology insights and product updates.
Also find us on: LinkedIn · X · Bluesky · Mastodon · DEV.to.